........*.
.......***
....***.*.
......*..*
..*.**...*
..*.*.***.
..**.*....
.*...*....
***..*....
.*.**.....
CopperSearch v0.2 wrote:CopperSearch version 0.2 ran with parameters 'd 37/256' and found the following patterns:
Total: 0 patterns
CopperSearch version 0.2 ran with parameters 'd 41/256' and found the following patterns:
Total: 0 patterns
......**..
.....**.**
....**...*
...**..**.
..**....*.
.**...*...
**...*....
*..*......
.*.**.....
.**.......
x = 7, y = 5, rule = B3/S2-i3-y4i
4b3o$6bo$o3b3o$2o$bo!
x = 7, y = 5, rule = B3/S2-i3-y4i
4b3o$6bo$o3b3o$2o$bo!
x = 7, y = 5, rule = B3/S2-i3-y4i
4b3o$6bo$o3b3o$2o$bo!
6b2o2b$5b2ob2o$4b2o3bo$3b2o2b2ob$2b2o4bob$b2o4bo2b$2o8b$o2bobo4b$bob2o5b$b2o7b!
x = 7, y = 5, rule = B3/S2-i3-y4i
4b3o$6bo$o3b3o$2o$bo!
x = 7, y = 5, rule = B3/S2-i3-y4i
4b3o$6bo$o3b3o$2o$bo!
Bullet51 wrote:#176 complete. It seems that the C version of Coppersearch is the fastest. Thanks simeks!
biggiemac wrote:I have started 112-119, 192-199, 200-207, and 224-231 via (x/8)/32 where x is start value. Please please let me know if this is going to give different results than I expected. I want to be able to leave my computer alone for a longish time.
simeks wrote:biggiemac wrote:I have started 112-119, 192-199, 200-207, and 224-231 via (x/8)/32 where x is start value. Please please let me know if this is going to give different results than I expected. I want to be able to leave my computer alone for a longish time.
Because parts go from 1 to Max, not from 0 to (Max - 1), I don't think that could be correct.
The first one you're suggesting would be "14/32", but there are 13 32-parts before that, corresponding to 104 256-parts, so 14/32 would correspond to 105-112/256 if I understand it correctly.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests