muzik wrote:Here come the YouTube views.
...assuming I had a high enough quality recording software.
Saka wrote:The $1000 Question:
How meta can we go?
muzik wrote:Saka wrote:The $1000 Question:
How meta can we go?
Kindly ask the government or some other organisations with extremely hi-tech computer technology if you can borrow theirs.
Saka wrote:*Finds 7271c/1839281729 ship (Is this 7271c/1839281729 spaceship known? There may be bugs with zfind)*
David wrote:Saka wrote:*Finds 7271c/1839281729 ship (Is this 7271c/1839281729 spaceship known? There may be bugs with zfind)*
Is B3/S23 really that omniperiodic(or, should I say, "omnivelocital")?
muzik wrote:There are no c ships, so no (unless you only count stuff below and including c/2).
NoLongerBreathedIn wrote:I prefer the following definition of omnivelocitality:
CA C is omnivelocital if there is a real x s.t. for all a,b,p (a≥b, a/p<x, a,b,p coprime), there is an n such that there is a spaceship with period and speed (an, bn)c/pn.
Note that this is speed less than x in l^∞ norm, not l^1 norm usually used for 23/3, because that's easier.
calcyman wrote:"A CA is omnivelocital if there is an open set U in Q^2 such that (0, 0) is in U and for every (a, b) in U, there is a spaceship with velocity (a, b)/c."
David wrote:calcyman wrote:"A CA is omnivelocital if there is an open set U in Q^2 such that (0, 0) is in U and for every (a, b) in U, there is a spaceship with velocity (a, b)/c."
Err... Why open?
calcyman wrote:So that it contains a ball around the origin of some non-zero radius. (The two are clearly equivalent; just take the interior of your ball-containing set.)
David wrote:calcyman wrote:So that it contains a ball around the origin of some non-zero radius. (The two are clearly equivalent; just take the interior of your ball-containing set.)
Why not the border?? Also, any subset of Q² cannot be an open set, except the empty set.
Hmm... But it might be a little important for specifying records (i.e. is the current status of gemini kc or kc-ε? (k is about 0.002 according to biggiemac))calcyman wrote:1. If U contains an open ball, then it also contains a non-trivial closed ball, and vice-versa. So requiring a border again has no effect on the definition.
Interesting. So that's how you define topology... I've never thought of such a concept as every point of Q^2 is seperated from each other...calcyman wrote:2. Completely wrong. If U is an open subset of R^2, then the intersection of U with Q^2 is an open subset of Q^2 (that's basically how the subspace topology is defined).
Scorbie wrote:...Interesting. So that's how you define topology... I've never thought of such a concept as every point of Q^2 is seperated from each other...calcyman wrote:2. Completely wrong. If U is an open subset of R^2, then the intersection of U with Q^2 is an open subset of Q^2 (that's basically how the subspace topology is defined).
gameoflifemaniac wrote:This is completely off-topic!
calcyman wrote:Attached is a blinker made of copies of Brice Due's OTCA-metapixel, which are themselves made of OTCA-metapixels. Consequently, the period of this pattern is 2496135168; Golly can run an entire period over the course of a day at a step size of 8^5.
idonteven wrote:calcyman wrote:Attached is a blinker made of copies of Brice Due's OTCA-metapixel, which are themselves made of OTCA-metapixels. Consequently, the period of this pattern is 2496135168; Golly can run an entire period over the course of a day at a step size of 8^5.
I tried doing this with the 'metafier' script and golly just exploded and said 'no memory'.
Also, sorry for the inactivity. I have a lot of homework. :p
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests