calcyman wrote:Are you using Cygwin or WSL?
Cygwin.
calcyman wrote:Are you using Cygwin or WSL?
AforAmpere wrote:calcyman wrote:Are you using Cygwin or WSL?
Cygwin.
calcyman wrote:I can reproduce the issue. It looks like there are at least two fundamental problems here:
- iglucose fails to open the named pipe;
- Only one worker succeeds in retrieving an item from the JoinableQueue.
AforAmpere wrote:2718281828, do you know if the searches done here were done with rokicki's zfind?
http://www.conwaylife.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=2031&start=675#p61750
./ntzfind B3/S23 w10 p13 k6 g l2000 r >> output.txt
[...]
Search complete: 0 spaceships found.
Calculations: 127042129051549
CPU time: 1941764.468000 seconds
Billabob wrote:The other search is still going strong at 189T calculations and 3.5M seconds. I'll edit this post when it finishes (unless one or more months have passed.) Both were run on ntzfind v3.0.
AforAmpere wrote:What search are you running currently, and have you done any other high witth 6c/13 searches besides g?
Also, were all of the searches you ran in your spreadsheet also zfind 3.0?
Also, is there any other website you could put that file on? I really don't trust that one.
x = 118, y = 49, rule = B3/S23
$15bo6bo$14b2o6b2o30bo5bo36bo$53b2o5b2o35bo$12bo2bo6bo2bo26bob2o3b2obo
32bo3bo$12bo2bo6bo2bo25b2o9b2o31b2ob2o$14b2o6b2o27b2o2b2ob2o2b2o31bo3b
o$16bo4bo29b2o2b2ob2o2b2o28b2o2bobo2b2o$14b3o4b3o28b2ob2ob2ob2o29b5ob
5o$15bo6bo32b2ob2o32b3ob3ob3o$54b2o3b2o2$16b6o30bo9bo29b3o2bo2b3o$15bo
2b2o2bo28bo11bo28bo3bobo3bo$14bo3b2o3bo25bobobobo3bobobobo25bo2bobobob
o2bo$14bo2bo2bo2bo25bob4o5b4obo24b6obob6o$14b3o4b3o25b2o13b2o24b2o3bob
obo3b2o$14bob6obo27bo11bo27bob2ob3ob2obo$18b2o32b2o7b2o29b3o5b3o$13b2o
3b2o3b2o71b3o$15bo2b2o2bo31bo5bo34bo3bo$12b4o2b2o2b4o24bo2bo7bo2bo$12b
o12bo24b2obo7bob2o30b2ob2o$13b3o6b3o27bo9bo31b2o3b2o$51b2o9b2o29bobo3b
obo$12b2ob2o4b2ob2o24bo13bo28bo2bobo2bo$11bo4bo4bo4bo23bobo2bo3bo2bobo
25b2ob2obobob2ob2o$10bo2b2o2b4o2b2o2bo22bo3b2o3b2o3bo25b3o2b2ob2o2b3o$
11bobobobo2bobobobo25b2obo3bob2o32bo3bo$13bobo6bobo28b2o5b2o30b4o3b4o$
17b4o30b2ob2o3b2ob2o27bo2b2o3b2o2bo$16bo4bo27b2obobo5bobob2o25b3o7b3o$
13bo2bo4bo2bo24b2obob2o3b2obob2o$12bob4o2b4obo24bobo2bo3bo2bobo$11bo3b
o6bo3bo22bo4bo5bo4bo27b4ob4o$11bo2bo8bo2bo23b2ob2o5b2ob2o25b2obob2ob2o
bob2o$10b2ob3o6b3ob2o25b4ob4o27bo15bo$11bo3b2o4b2o3bo23bo13bo29bo5bo$
11bobobob4obobobo22bo2bobobobobobo2bo27b2o5b2o$12b2obob4obob2o23b5o2bo
bo2b5o23b4o3bobo3b4o$14b2o6b2o67bo5bo5bo$14bob2o2b2obo73bo$92bo9bo!
x = 12, y = 29, rule = B3/S23
2obo2b2o$bo3bob3o$bo3bob5o$bo3b4o$5bob2o$7bobo$2b3o3b2o$2b2o3b2o$4bobo
bo$bo2bo3bo$2b3o$10bo$2bobo5bo$2bobo2b2obo$3b4o$8bo$6bobo$7b2o2$7b3o$
3bo4bo$3bo$3b2obo$5b2o$4b3o$ob3o$o3bo$bobo$2bo!
x = 20, y = 75, rule = B3/S23
8bo2bo$o2bobo3b2o3bobo2bo$7b6o$2b2o3bo4bo3b2o$8bo2bo$3b2ob2o4b2ob2o$7b
o4bo$2bo3bo6bo3bo$2bo4b2o2b2o4bo$3bob2o6b2obo$7bo4bo$3bo3bo4bo3bo$2b2o
5b2o5b2o$3b2ob8ob2o$6bo6bo$6b3o2b3o$4bo3b4o3bo$2b5obo2bob5o$3b5o4b5o3$
3b5o4b5o$2bo5bo2bo5bo$b2o4bo4bo4b2o$b2obo2bo4bo2bob2o$4b2o8b2o$5b2o6b
2o2$2bobo3bo2bo3bobo$3bo12bo$3bo3bo4bo3bo$7b2o2b2o$5bo8bo$5bo2bo2bo2bo
$8b4o$7bo4bo$8bo2bo$7b2o2b2o$5b2ob4ob2o$6b2o4b2o$5b3o4b3o$4b2o8b2o$b2o
3bo6bo3b2o$obob2o8b2obobo$b2o14b2o$2bo2bo8bo2bo$3bob2o6b2obo$2b2o3bo4b
o3b2o$3bo4bo2bo4bo$8bo2bo$3b3o2b4o2b3o$3b3o8b3o$4bo2bo4bo2bo$4b3o2b2o
2b3o$5b2o2b2o2b2o3$6b3o2b3o$b2o2bo3b2o3bo2b2o$3bobo8bobo$5b2ob4ob2o$o
18bo$bob2o10b2obo$2b3o10b3o$4b2o8b2o$b2obo10bob2o$b2ob2o8b2ob2o$2bo14b
o$4bo10bo$3b2o10b2o$2bo14bo$2bo14bo$bobo12bobo$2bo14bo$2bo14bo!
2718281828 wrote:I did this a 2c/9 witdh while ago, all negative for symmetries, most promising partials:
AforAmpere wrote:2718281828 wrote:I did this a 2c/9 witdh while ago, all negative for symmetries, most promising partials:
Width 9 for all symmetries? And with zfind 3.0?
AforAmpere wrote:Okay I'll update the table then. Any other searches not reflected in the table that you did with ntzfind or zfind 3.0 or later?
./ntzfind B3/S23 w7 p13 k2 g l2000 r
ntzfind 3.0 by "zdr", Matthias Merzenich, Aidan Pierce, and Tomas Rokicki, 24 February 2018
- ./ntzfind B3/S23 w7 p13 k2 g l2000 r
Rule: B3/S23
Period: 13
Offset: 2
Width: 7
Symmetry: gutter
Depth limit: 2000
Stop search if a ship is found.
Use randomized search order.
[...]
Search complete: 0 spaceships found.
Calculations: 204355688396592
CPU time: 3779101.922000 seconds
x = 21, y = 24, rule = B3/S23
6bo7bo$5bobo5bobo$4b2ob2o3b2ob2o$4b2obo5bob2o$4bo3bo3bo3bo2$7bo5bo$2b
2o13b2o$3b2o11b2o$8bo3bo$4bo2bo5bo2bo$4b2obo5bob2o$2bobobo7bobobo$b2o
3bobo3bobo3b2o$b2obo4bobo4bob2o$bo17bo$6bo7bo$bo2b3o2bobo2b3o2bo$2b3o
3bo3bo3b3o$5bo2bo3bo2bo$4bo2bo5bo2bo$3obob2o5b2obob3o$b3ob4o3b4ob3o$7b
3ob3o!
Billabob wrote:the mystery search has finished.Code: Select all./ntzfind B3/S23 w7 p13 k2 g l2000 r
ntzfind 3.0 by "zdr", Matthias Merzenich, Aidan Pierce, and Tomas Rokicki, 24 February 2018
- ./ntzfind B3/S23 w7 p13 k2 g l2000 r
Rule: B3/S23
Period: 13
Offset: 2
Width: 7
Symmetry: gutter
Depth limit: 2000
Stop search if a ship is found.
Use randomized search order.
[...]
Search complete: 0 spaceships found.
Calculations: 204355688396592
CPU time: 3779101.922000 seconds
AforAmpere wrote:Wow, I'm amazed that took so long. Do you ever run u or v searches? Asymmetric comes with gutter, but that leaves a strange gap in searching for some speeds.
EDIT, the link to the Drive file was for a w8 6c/13 search. Are you sure you ran w10? Are the other widths correct?
EDIT, never mind, it was lower in the file.
Sokwe wrote:Why are you using the randomized search order? The default order should be slightly faster.
Sokwe wrote:@AforAmpere, you've been updating the ntzfind table a lot. Could you please post some of your partial results?
x = 9, y = 22, rule = B3/S23
5bo$4bobo$6b2o$2bo3bo$bo$b2ob2o$3bo$5bobo$2b5o$3bo2bo$2bo2bo$3b2o$4bob
o$5b2o$2b2o$bo$3b4o$bo4bo$bo2bo$6b2o$bo2bob3o$3o3bo!
x = 34, y = 24, rule = B3/S23
2bo27bo$2bo27bo$bobo25bobo$3bo27bo$b2ob2o23b2ob2o$2bo27bo$2bo2bo24bo2b
o$2b2obo24b2obo$o2bo24bo2bo$obo25bobo$bo27bo2$2b2o26b2o$b3o25b3o$o3bo
23bo2bo$4b2o22bo$4b3o22b2o$5bo$26bob3o$b4o21b3ob2o$3b3o21bo3bo$b2o2bob
o18bo2bo2bo$4bo2bo18bo2b2ob2o$bo4b2o!
x = 8, y = 26, rule = B3/S23
4bo$3bobo$3bobo$4b2o2$5bo$3b3o$4bo$2b2obo$2b3o$4bo$b3o$5bo$2bo3bo$2bo
3bo$5bo$2b4o$b2o3bo$o4b2o$2b2o$4bo$3bo$b2ob3o$o2b2obo$obo2b3o$2b2o!
x = 42, y = 17, rule = B3/S23
4bo6bo19bo5bo$3bobo4bobo17bobo3bobo$2b2ob2o2b2ob2o15b2ob2ob2ob2o$2b2ob
o4bob2o16bo2bobo2bo$2bo2bo4bo2bo17b3ob3o$7b2o22bobobobo$bo4bo2bo4bo2$o
3b3o2b3o3bo13b3o5b3o$o2bo8bo2bo12bo2bo2bo2bo2bo$4bo6bo19b3ob3o$bob3o4b
3obo13bo4bobo4bo$2b2obo4bob2o14bobo3bo3bobo$5b2o2b2o17bo2bo5bo2bo$b2o
2b2o2b2o2b2o12b3ob2o3b2ob3o$b4o6b4o14bob2o3b2obo$28bo4bobo4bo!
x = 9, y = 50, rule = B3/S23
5bo$5bo$5b2o$b2o$2bo3b3o2$4b3o$3bobo$3b3o$3b2o$4bo$2b2ob2o$2b2ob2o$3bo
$5b2o$3bobo$2b2o$3bo$5b2o$bo$6bo$3bo2bo$3bo3bo$4bobo$5bobo$6b2o$5bo2bo
$5bobo$6bo$b2obo$6bo$bo5bo$2b2o3bo$5bo$4b2o$o2bo2bo$3bo2bo$3bo3bo$4b4o
$3bo3bo$3bo2bo$bo$bo3b2o2$3b2obo$3bo3b2o$3bobobo$6b2o$2bobobo$o3b2ob2o
!
x = 10, y = 14, rule = B3/S23
5bo$4bobo$3b2ob2o$2b2o2bo$bo4bo$bo3bo$2b2o$5b3o$3bo3bo$2bo2bo$bo4bo$o
4bo$2b2ob2o$b2obobo!
x = 7, y = 5, rule = B3/S2-i3-y4i
4b3o$6bo$o3b3o$2o$bo!
Hdjensofjfnen wrote:Hmm... has anyone looked for slope-6 ships? [e.g. (6,1)c/14]
x = 7, y = 33, rule = B3/S23
4bo$3bobo$3bobo$4bo2$4bo$3bobo$3bo2bo$3bobo$3b2o$2b3o$b5o$3o$bo2bo$bo
2bo$bo3bo$b2ob2o$4b2o$3bobo$4b3o$3bob2o$2b2ob2o$2bo$3bo$bobob2o$o2bo$
6bo$2bobo$2bob2o$3obobo$bobobo$bo3b2o$bo3bo!
AforAmpere wrote:C/9 w8 a was rechecked with zfind 3, no positive results. I'll run w8 g next.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests