Search found 8 matches
- June 18th, 2016, 2:20 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Replicator in WWEJ
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3116
Re: Replicator in WWEJ
I posted this file almost a year ago... I hope this necro is allowed, just because literally no one even looked at it. In such a small forum, I guess that's expected, but I kind of wanted at least one response. I recognize this machine could be greatly improved - both improvements directly towards r...
- October 18th, 2015, 6:55 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Replicator in WWEJ
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3116
Replicator in WWEJ
Heyo! I decided to make a replicator. I chose WWEJ to do it. More information is included in the zip file, namely in the comment field of WWEJ_self_replicator.mc.gz and in the script files. https://www.dropbox.com/s/un7ivve8c1inzor/WWEJ%20Replicator%20and%20Scripts.zip?dl=0 Note: The tape reader was...
- October 18th, 2015, 5:17 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Free Star (0345/2/10)
- Replies: 44
- Views: 28234
Re: Free Star (0345/2/10)
A small puffer:
Code: Select all
x = 19, y = 8, rule = 0345/2/10
.GFE$HAE2.HGB2.A$IFEF2GDC6A$GH3.HID.ADCB2A$8.DGDG.C.C.A$7.I2FHE2BD4A$
.A3.A.H.AHDFADAB2A$7.HIFGDEBC.A!- October 18th, 2015, 3:22 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Calculator in new chip-design logic cellular automaton: LLLL
- Replies: 16
- Views: 13186
Re: Calculator in new chip-design logic cellular automaton: LLLL
Wow. This is an incredible rule! Very, very well documented, and with a lot of computing potential. It would be interesting to see this rule with a construction arm concept, but that would add even more states, so it might not be worth the effort. I think it's pretty awesome that you made all these ...
- September 17th, 2015, 10:57 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Attract and Repel
- Replies: 83
- Views: 44555
Re: Attract and Repel
This rule sort of reminds me of this: http://www.srm.org.uk/papers/comprepel.pdf Except without fixed elements and with splitting added. Is this rule being emulated correctly? snip Very close. I can't find the behaviour of the original rule on conflicts (i.e. XO.OX, X being fixed, O dynamic, and . ...
- August 31st, 2015, 6:31 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Devore's CA and Computation
- Replies: 8
- Views: 4849
Re: Devore's CA and Computation
Where's the rule?
- August 30th, 2015, 7:51 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: WireWorld Crossover?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 4199
WireWorld Crossover?
Does anyone know of a crossover organ in WireWorld that is completely asynchronous? i.e. The adjacency of the signals doesn't matter. Using the standard XOR-based crossover organ, the signals have to either be completely disjoint (i.e. one goes through the gates entirely before the other) or exactly...
- August 30th, 2015, 7:47 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Attract and Repel
- Replies: 83
- Views: 44555
Re: Attract and Repel
This rule sort of reminds me of this:
http://www.srm.org.uk/papers/comprepel.pdf
Except without fixed elements and with splitting added.
http://www.srm.org.uk/papers/comprepel.pdf
Except without fixed elements and with splitting added.