ConwayLife.com

1. I fail to have got any actual concrete NP problems solution algorithms yet. What I HAVE managed to do is prove that they can be solved within the P problems solution time periods in principles, or (in other words), basically somehow (with some unknown methods), and the proofs employed the dmd's o...

NO! I am seriously "eager" (so to speak) for the progress of the math including future CA theories and DNA/RNA computing theories, believe me. If you feel disgusted at my sounding arrogant or provocative, excuse me. But I am a believer in Good Samaritanism, honest! I was wondering if I might be of a...

1. Sorry: my 3-Coloring Theorem "proof" has proved to be wrong/false after more careful considerations. 2. But I'm sure you see that my Cantor/Goedel-DMd's (Doctorate of Math disqualifications) are absolutely fool-proof truths; so, the P=NP proofs that are based on the DMd's or not based on them sti...

1. Can you look on human brains as 10^11 (one hundred billion) D (dimensional) Turmites?
2. Can a multi-D Turmites also have glider guns?

ditto.

Let me ask you all a fool basic question since I am still a mere/sheer novice/beginner in this field/discipline: does the existence of gliders mean the existence of gliders-guns? If not, which kinds of gliders are accompanied/produced by gliders-guns?

I understand very well as common-sensical your opinion about my claim. But believe me: e. g. , dmd's are so simple/foolproof: A. 2 < Aleph0, so Aleph1 = 2^Aleph0 ≦ (is equal to or smaller than) Aleph0^Aleph0 = Aleph0 (all by the proofs by Cantor himself); B. iff Goedel logical formula is G, then G =...

So, is DNA/RNA-based computing just/merely a kind of probabilistic (guesswork or approximation) computation? But don't the actual DNA and RNAs work on a proper/right non-guesswork/approximation basis/principle for the one valid solution instead of some optimal solution(s)? I mean, aren''t any CAs-im...

Are any such things feasible? And are messenger-RNAs imitations by CAs possible? Was the RNA-computing by L. F. Landweber et al a messenger-RNAs-imitation? (Cukras, A.R., Faulhammer, D., Lipton, R.J. and Landweber, L.F.: Chess games: a model for RNA based computation, "BioSystems," Vol.52, pp.35-45,...

Can any CAs or Turmites make DNA-computing architectures? Especially, can Turmites imitate messenger-RNAs?

Here are two disproofs of my previous assertion that all CAs are equivalent to chaotic/fractals-generating CAs and to Life UTMs: 1. Even neat orderly rules can give some CAs a neat orderly trait of the lack of logical gates. 2. Chaotic CAs, non-chaotic CAs, Lifes, non-Life CAs make a cross classific...

1. Prof Carter Bays says that 5655 seems to lack guns; but is it still a UTM?
2. Is or are either or both of 4555 and 5766 UTM(s)?
3. Does 6777 release gliders periodically?: Can you look on its primordial soup as a kind of gun(s)?

Is there to any particular two-dimensional CA a map/function specifying/describing the conjunction of its rules? Does the function always have two variables or two parameters?

1. Do all the conjunctions of the CAs rules generating or representing two-dimensional self-similar fractals have two "variables"/factors (including a parameter) as in the recurrence formula producing or representing the Mandelbrot set coupled with the Julia set(s)? 2. And do all the functions/maps ...

Then let me re-formulate my question: can all the finite-distance/area/radius-neighborhooded CAs handle all the finite-sized fractals unlike golden-b tilings? Namely, can you reduce/attribute all the finite chaos theory to the finite fractal theory as the finite chaos world lines theory or vice versa?

By "Life" do you mean B3/S23 -- Conway's Life -- or any CA? If B3/S23, then yes because Life has been proven to be universal and can therefore do anything you can program a computer to do. Can "Life" mean/refer_to "any CA"? Then what do you say about my last comment on "Life Imitates Sierpinski" to...

1. Can Life produce or imitate Sierpinski carpet or something which has disconnected parts?
2. If it can, does that mean all fractals are some kinds of chaotic attractors, namely, the trajectories of Life movements/actions?

I take back my previous assertion. It is true that if Life = chaos, then all CAs = UTMs, but that is not the case. The reasons are twofold: 1. You lack any prospects for the proof of the antecedent: that Life is the necessary and sufficient condition of fractals-generations. 2. You fail to experimen...

How can you give a CA the three kinds of logic gates without guns? Would anyone explain the principles outlines to me, a CA-ology beginner?

How can you give a CA the three kinds of logic gates without guns, I wonder? Would anyone explain the principles outlines to me, a CA-ology beginner?

Has anybody found such things? Has Professor Carter Bays discovered 3D guns? I'd like to know if high dimensional Lifes DID/DO turn out to be UTMs or not.

I got it!: Life IS the "fractals"-producing "chaos". Since even LG, one of the "orderly" UTMs, is equivalent to (is the necessary and sufficient condition of) "chaotic-wake" results, all the CAs are too: they are all equivalent discrete/approximated-"fractal"-arithmetic-geometry-containing UTMs; the...

Does a 3D or 4D or arbitrary multi-D Life have glider guns?
Did Prof. Bays find ones in 3D Life?

Does "chaos" that produces multi-D Sierpinski imitate multi-D Life in reverse/to the contrary? I'd like to know if all the multi-D Life-like-CAs are equivalent to Life in terms of their UTM-ness.