Search found 268 matches
- Today, 5:31 am
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: Spaceship Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2720
- Views: 1070311
Re: Spaceship Discussion Thread
(3,0)c/10 is both fast and high period. There's nothing really special about it except that it's the simplified speed of the natural pi propagation. It's very unlikely to be found any time soon, and I think there would generally be less interest in this speed which further reduces its chances. Yes,...
- Today, 4:11 am
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: Spaceship Discussion Thread
- Replies: 2720
- Views: 1070311
Re: Spaceship Discussion Thread
Just curious, are we more likely to find a spaceship with speed:
c/8o,
c/9o,
c/9d,
3c/10o,
c/7k,
c/8c?
c/8o,
c/9o,
c/9d,
3c/10o,
c/7k,
c/8c?
- Today, 2:27 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Next steps on getting back to normal editing for OCA:tlife
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11
Re: Better solution
Protecting the T life page is a little overboard just to stop one or two editors, as it prevents more productive edits from taking place. I suggest giving a partial block (For only the t life page) to those that have caused the most chaos in the edit war, instead of protecting it and not allowing a...
- Today, 1:55 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: LifeWiki Did-You-Knows
- Replies: 59
- Views: 68447
Re: LifeWiki Did-You-Knows
There is a error, where "10 of 170" dyks are shown, but only 161 of them are actually shown. Can an admin correct this?
- Today, 1:51 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Next steps on getting back to normal editing for OCA:tlife
- Replies: 4
- Views: 11
Next steps on getting back to normal editing for OCA:tlife
Protecting the T life page is a little overboard just to stop one or two editors, as it prevents more productive edits from taking place. I suggest giving a partial block (For only the t life page) to those that have caused the most chaos in the edit war, instead of protecting it and not allowing an...
- Yesterday, 11:00 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Mikipedia clutter
- Replies: 17
- Views: 297
Re: Mikipedia clutter
Yes, but I would only have ignored those without.hotdogPi wrote: ↑Yesterday, 8:28 amYou do realize those pages contained racial slurs, right?Haycat2009 wrote: ↑Yesterday, 2:18 amIf cvojan had created the spam pages in their userspace, I would have ignored them.
- Yesterday, 4:56 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Mikipedia clutter
- Replies: 17
- Views: 297
Re: Mikipedia clutter
I understand, but the userpage is one's castle. One can do anything they like as long as it does not spread out to the main page space. Things like spam, attacking content, high-activity editing are still detrimental, even if in userspace. Ultimately the wiki is a shared space with a specific scope...
- Yesterday, 2:25 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Request a Rule to be "Tamed"
- Replies: 135
- Views: 79283
Re: Request a Rule to be "Tamed"
Can you please tame B2a/S12 such in a way that lightspeed travel is still possible, but it does not explode?
- Yesterday, 2:18 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Mikipedia clutter
- Replies: 17
- Views: 297
Re: Mikipedia clutter
No need. Most Users have no other place to create hooked or sus stuff. As long as it stays within the Userpage space, it is fine. Maybe it would be fine (but this comes from just another pseudorandom CA enthusiast and wiki editor), if only (a) it was significantly less active than it is recently, (...
- Yesterday, 1:00 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Mikipedia clutter
- Replies: 17
- Views: 297
Re: Mikipedia clutter
So far, here and on Discord, there haven't been any claims that the Mikipedia pages are relevant to the LifeWiki in any way. The best argument is that " edits are fine if it’s just once in a while". But "once in a while" isn't a good description of the last several days of editing (before today). A...
- November 25th, 2023, 12:11 pm
- Forum: The Sandbox
- Topic: Alt Universe
- Replies: 42
- Views: 12179
- November 24th, 2023, 2:54 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
- Replies: 17
- Views: 288
Re: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
https://xkcd.com/2595/ In 2022 Cribbage does not exist, so the p19 category was useless, and attempts to add cribbage was spam. Such attempts could be considered spam (e.g. if it was some non-CA-related content). Or the page could be moved to another pagename, if it happened to be about a notable t...
- November 24th, 2023, 2:30 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
- Replies: 17
- Views: 288
Re: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
If B36/S23 was named recently, you would still be doing this. I would still be doing what, exactly? In a parallel universe where B36/S23 was only named a few weeks or months ago and only few people looked into it, it would not make a lot of sense to go and replace all occurrences of the rulestring ...
- November 24th, 2023, 1:42 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
- Replies: 17
- Views: 288
Re: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
Highlife has the same amount of sense as Grounded Life, but it is still preferred. HighLife was investigated/discussed by more people who used the name over time in discussions. B35/S23 was named recently. If B36/S23 was named recently, you would still be doing this. In 2022 Cribbage does not exist...
- November 24th, 2023, 12:22 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
- Replies: 17
- Views: 288
Re: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
Names of things are not required to mean or "symbolise" anything at all. If several people other than you used the same name consistently over time to refer to the same thing, that suffices to keep the name on the wiki. As a pseudorandom example, the recently-coined name 'Grounded Life' for B35/S23...
- November 24th, 2023, 12:20 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
- Replies: 17
- Views: 288
Re: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
keeping inaccurate info The name of something (a rule, a pattern, a corporation, etc.) does not generally provide any particularly accurate information. This is normal. Names do not have to make sense. The existing name is commonly used and there are no other commonly used names (unless you count t...
- November 23rd, 2023, 11:52 pm
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
- Replies: 17
- Views: 288
Re: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
keeping inaccurate info The name of something (a rule, a pattern, a corporation, etc.) does not generally provide any particularly accurate information. This is normal. Names do not have to make sense. So are you implying that I can name several unnamed rules weird things, like Sus Rule for B38/S23...
- November 23rd, 2023, 5:58 am
- Forum: Website Discussion
- Topic: Thread for your website-related questions
- Replies: 257
- Views: 47647
Re: Thread for your website-related questions
- November 23rd, 2023, 3:32 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Thread for basic non-CGOL questions
- Replies: 797
- Views: 268376
Re: Thread for basic non-CGOL questions
Other then B/S012345678, are there any other reversable INT CA?
- November 23rd, 2023, 3:31 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Margolus-neighborhood rules
- Replies: 56
- Views: 15846
Re: Margolus-neighborhood rules
Why are margolus rules usually reversable? Also, what is the notation for margolus rules?
- November 23rd, 2023, 3:18 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Thread for basic questions
- Replies: 4390
- Views: 1178096
- November 23rd, 2023, 3:16 am
- Forum: LifeWiki Discussion
- Topic: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
- Replies: 17
- Views: 288
Re: Regarding the name of the """logarithmic""" replicator rule
3. Move it to "OCA:sqrt replicator rule" or (in keeping with O(sqrt(log(t))) ) "OCA:Θ(√t) replicator rule" (Proposed by me) I support this option. People are just going to make up random and even less accurate names (eg. Sussy rule, Toll booth, Air Jordan Rule) if we move it to B36/S245. EDIT by dv...
- November 23rd, 2023, 2:48 am
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: LLSSS min pop search results spam
- Replies: 26
- Views: 1339
Re: LLSSS min pop search results spam
Honestly, you should try this to search for the minimum population of a c/8 ship. Earlier in this thread, Amling said that the search couldn't even complete a c/7 orthogonal search beyond 3 cells . A c/8 search would be even less effective. Even brute force would be faster, i should have known.
- November 23rd, 2023, 2:22 am
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: LLSSS min pop search results spam
- Replies: 26
- Views: 1339
Re: LLSSS min pop search results spam
Honestly, you should try this to search for the minimum population of a c/8 ship.
- November 23rd, 2023, 1:57 am
- Forum: The Sandbox
- Topic: post your ctrl+v (game)
- Replies: 8
- Views: 340