## Search found 484 matches

- March 9th, 2017, 2:52 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Use Smoothiness to classify rules
- Replies:
**132** - Views:
**39661**

### Re: Use Smoothiness to classify rules

Instead of expressing dynamic difference purely on the difference between rulestrings, weight the changed neighborhoods based on the frequency in which they appear naturally in the two rules. (I say check both rules to preserve transitiveness of the dynamic difference and give a more refined estima...

- March 5th, 2017, 2:34 pm
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: Oscillator Discussion Thread
- Replies:
**1245** - Views:
**550331**

### Re: Oscillator Discoveries Thread

is there any way to add generations instead of multiplying them? :mrgreen: Not exactly, but some oscillators are able to be combined in ways such that the resulting new oscillator's period is less than the two oscillators' least common multiple. This occurs when the two interfere with one another a...

- March 3rd, 2017, 1:05 pm
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: Thread for your unsure discoveries
- Replies:
**1769** - Views:
**861811**

### Re: Thread for your unsure discoveries

I just made a period 23 oscillator: rle and yes, it is trivial, and YES, it is all strictly bound, you cannot take away any of the loaves. :D I imagine the listing as p23 is either a mistake in measurement or a typo, as it can't be a trivial p23 because 23 is a prime number. Seeing that the two com...

- February 14th, 2017, 2:50 am
- Forum: The Sandbox
- Topic: What's your apgcode?
- Replies:
**11** - Views:
**3396**

### Re: What's your apgcode?

Evolves into a Herschel and a massive 'spark':

Code: Select all

```
x = 12, y = 5, rule = B3/S23
b2obo3bobo$3b2o3bob2o$o2b2obo3bo$2obob5obo$3ob2ob4o!
```

- January 18th, 2017, 2:54 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Another shapeloop?
- Replies:
**4** - Views:
**1532**

### Re: Another shapeloop?

4 barreled gun:

Code: Select all

```
x = 6, y = 10, rule = myDNA2
B5A$E4.A$A4.E$B4.B$F4.A$A4.A$B4.A$F4.A$A4.A$BEABDA!
```

- January 5th, 2017, 12:03 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Create your own terminology
- Replies:
**105** - Views:
**40478**

### Re: Create your own terminology

I think the best equivalent of a spaceship "stator" cell is a cell in a ship of period N which is alive for N consecutive generations (not moving with the ship each period, so it will be left behind eventually). However, this would mean that a c/1 ship like the Moon would be entirely made of "stator...

- December 26th, 2016, 6:08 pm
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: is this c/10 spaceship known?
- Replies:
**355** - Views:
**465286**

### Re: is this c/10 spaceship known?

The last thing i found was, that copperheads has the same speed as corderships in one dimension (c/10). I don't think that's the correct explanation for the pattern shown below. You can see the copperheads go farther to the left than the corderships the longer the pattern runs. There is a reason wh...

- December 24th, 2016, 7:04 pm
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: Meta-meta-blinker
- Replies:
**26** - Views:
**20773**

### Re: Meta-meta-blinker

This discussion reminds me of a set of classifications based around the same idea of 'omni-velocity' rules that I had posted here earlier this year. Those classifications do have one drawback compared to the one here, which is that any rule with lightspeed spaceships is extremely unlikely to even ac...

- December 15th, 2016, 4:34 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: B3/S2-i34t5ae
- Replies:
**34** - Views:
**10047**

### Re: B3/S2-i34t5ae

Progress on making a 5c/33 diagonal ship: x = 375, y = 292, rule = B3/S2-i34t5ae 277b2o$276bo2bo63bo$277b2o63bobo$342bobo$343bo29bo$372bobo$372bobo$ 373bo3$267b2o$266bo2bo63bo$267b2o63bobo$332bobo$333bo29bo$362bobo$362b obo$363bo3$257b2o$256bo2bo63bo$257b2o63bobo$322bobo$323bo29bo$352bobo$ 352bobo$3...

- December 11th, 2016, 3:13 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: New loop rule (now with reduced states)
- Replies:
**2** - Views:
**1361**

### Re: New loop rule (now with reduced states)

Two interesting (but not necessarily loop related) behaviors I noticed in this rule so far: x = 56, y = 66, rule = Finality4 2.A.10A.A$2.A10.B.A$.A.A11.A$.A.A11.A$.A.A11.A$.A.A11.A$.A.A11.A$.A.A $.A.A.12A4$2.A.10A.A$2.A10.B.A$.A.A11.A$.A.A11.A$.A.A11.A$BA.A11.A$.A .A11.A$.A.A$.A.A.12A4$2.A.10A.A$2.A...

- December 6th, 2016, 3:32 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Movostill 2 (B3acijk/S23-a4)
- Replies:
**14** - Views:
**3373**

### Re: Movostill 2 (B3acijk/S23-a4)

p14 and p12 which also work in original Movostill rule:

Code: Select all

```
x = 29, y = 9, rule = B3acijk/S23-a4
22bo$21bobo$21b2o2$2bo8bo5bo8bo$4o6b4ob4o6b4o$o3bo4bo3bobo3bo4bo3bo$2b
obo4bobo5bobo4bobo$b2ob2o2b2ob2o3b2ob2o2b2ob2o!
```

- November 25th, 2016, 3:33 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: B2 Rules
- Replies:
**24** - Views:
**7833**

### Re: B2 Rules

If we're gonna include non-B2a rules, then let's not forget about B2ce3ai/S23. Speaking of which, that rule still has no known elementary spaceships at any speed other than c/2. Other speeds almost certainly exist via the Universal Constructor argument, but no ships have been made that way.

- October 31st, 2016, 2:24 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Extending apgcodes to larger patterns
- Replies:
**37** - Views:
**19507**

### Re: Extending apgcodes to larger patterns

There's a couple additional lossless options, all of which make things extra complex and aren't really backwards compatible (and one of them might make old apgcodes no longer 'correct'), such as: - being able to combine patterns represented in EWF into a 'compound' apgcode, having them placed via re...

- October 28th, 2016, 12:47 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: B3-ckq/S2-c34ci: Pi-plicator
- Replies:
**47** - Views:
**14166**

### Re: B3-ckq/S2-c34ci: Pi-plicator

BF49B (102) involving a transparent block: x = 33, y = 38, rule = B3-ckqS2-c34ciHistory 4D3.5D2.D3.D3.3D3.4D$D3.D2.D6.D3.D2.D3.D2.D3.D$D3.D2.D6.D3.D2.D3.D2.D 3.D$4D3.4D3.5D3.4D2.4D$D3.D2.D10.D6.D2.D3.D$D3.D2.D10.D6.D2.D3.D$4D3. D10.D3.3D3.4D3$10.A.A$10.3A2$10.5A$10.A.A.A$2.B9.B4.4B$2.2B8.2B2.5B$ 2.7...

- October 20th, 2016, 1:22 am
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: Soup search results
- Replies:
**2123** - Views:
**1236453**

### Re: Soup search results

I spent some time trying to reduce Super pond synthesis, which was listed at 24 gliders, and got it to 13G: x = 157, y = 31, rule = B3/S23 115bo$116bo$114b3o6$131bo$3o2b2o123bo$2bob2o28bo29bo29bo29bo5b3o20b2o$ bo4bo26bobo27bobo27bobo27bobo26bo2bo$32bobo27bobo27bobo27bobo8b2o16bob 2obo$31bobo27bobo27...

- October 17th, 2016, 12:01 pm
- Forum: The Sandbox
- Topic: Lifespan
- Replies:
**75** - Views:
**23945**

### Re: Lifespan

37 gens to tub:

Code: Select all

```
x = 4, y = 5, rule = B3/S23
bo$2bo$2b2o$2obo$obo!
```

- October 17th, 2016, 2:00 am
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: The Hunting of the New Herschel Conduits
- Replies:
**968** - Views:
**706742**

### Re: The Hunting of the New Herschel Conduits

I should probably update my conduit collections. Anyway, the goal with suppressing the 2nd natural glider was to try and find a way to clean up a different evolutionary sequence, but I ended up getting off track. Nice to see that Pi output wasn't entirely unusable after all.

- October 16th, 2016, 1:57 am
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: The Hunting of the New Herschel Conduits
- Replies:
**968** - Views:
**706742**

### Re: The Hunting of the New Herschel Conduits

Probably unusable H->P and related H->G (not sure if known, but found it after looking through the reaction stamp collection above and messing with one of them): x = 93, y = 35, rule = LifeHistory 24.3D5B51.4B$23.BD9B48.4B$23.B3D8B46.4B$22.13B45.4B$23.14B42.4B$23. 15B11.A28.4B$21.B.15B9.3A23.B3.4B$2...

- August 30th, 2016, 8:19 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Golly 2.8 has been released
- Replies:
**95** - Views:
**43081**

### Re: Golly 2.8 has been released

The notation used is a later one also created by Alan Hensel, which as you noted is more efficient: http://www.ibiblio.org/lifepatterns/neighbors2.html

- August 22nd, 2016, 8:14 pm
- Forum: The Sandbox
- Topic: Continue The Infinite Conduit! (game-y thing)
- Replies:
**44** - Views:
**18269**

### Re: Continue The Infinite Conduit! (game-y thing)

Conversion back to a more manageable signal is much easier by taking the 3rd row from the top instead of the 4th, as then there are 27 gliders instead of 19, and a 27-to-1 reduction can be achieved by stringing together three x3 multipliers. Seeing the 19-to-1 might be a bit more interesting though.

- August 18th, 2016, 1:25 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: B2 Rules
- Replies:
**24** - Views:
**7833**

### Re: LFOD Variants

I'd call those Seeds variants though, because they don't even have S0, which is the one difference between Seeds and LFOD.

- August 15th, 2016, 3:36 am
- Forum: The Sandbox
- Topic: Minigame sort of thing
- Replies:
**24** - Views:
**8286**

### Re: Minigame sort of thing

I'd argue that that's too close to the pattern, it almost certainly would have interacted already in any predecessor pattern sequence. The glider should be at least be separated so it won't interact immediately I think.blah wrote:1G, but faster.

- August 13th, 2016, 12:05 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: tlife (B3/S2-i34q)
- Replies:
**467** - Views:
**255783**

### Re: tlife (B3/S2-i34q)

Well, it's not really a conduit though since the block doesn't recover...BlinkerSpawn wrote:Well now we have an S-to-A and S-to-T, which means that all we really need is an X-to-S.

That being said, I'm not sure if any of the applicable scripts are applicable to rules other than Life...

- July 18th, 2016, 8:37 pm
- Forum: Patterns
- Topic: Spaceship Discussion Thread
- Replies:
**938** - Views:
**517807**

### Re: Spaceship Discussion Thread

I personally think that specifying speed as (x,y)c/p rather than dc/p for ships that move in oblique directions is better practice, for the reason that the latter gets confusing, ambiguous, and misleading if you aren't VERY careful. You're either going to imply the ship is faster than it is, or you'...

- July 14th, 2016, 5:52 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Thread For Your Unrecognised CA
- Replies:
**1517** - Views:
**517802**

### Re: Thread For Your Unrecognised CA

Oops, I accidentally misjudged the period of the p54... and then applied the doubling to the wrong value when describing the p108. My bad.