Search found 8 matches
- February 5th, 2021, 3:38 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Wireworld5
- Replies: 6
- Views: 2087
Re: Wireworld5
I love the concept! I wonder how you arrived on five as the requisite number of states; is four not enough? I agree with Yoel that the colors are a bit hard to see; here is an alternate @COLORS section that I find easier to work with, featuring a gradient from light to dark orange for "off" wires an...
- October 27th, 2020, 11:16 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: 8-bit microprocessor in a 7-state vN CA
- Replies: 7
- Views: 2431
8-bit microprocessor in a 7-state vN CA
A year and I half ago a made a 7-state rotate4reflect vN wiring CA and built a partial implementation of a Picoblaze microcontroller as a final project for my Digital Electronics class. The rule is called "DECA" for "Digital Electronics Cellular Automaton." Here is a video I made explaining the rule...
- October 21st, 2020, 12:06 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Creating a Better CA notation (because all the others suck)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5463
Re: One String to Rule Them All
Thank you for the corrections! I've updated the original post accordingly. Support for range 0 rules should not be required for compliance with the standard. I'd even say 'R0' should be syntactically invalid. That's fair. Range-0 rules are pretty useless. Provisions or specifications for 1D rules sh...
- October 21st, 2020, 1:51 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: Creating a Better CA notation (because all the others suck)
- Replies: 13
- Views: 5463
One String to Rule Them All
I am soon getting to the point where I will need to parse rulestrings in my own CA simulator, which has the additional challenge of supporting higher-dimensional CA, which no existing notation does sufficiently. Here is my proposal: One String to Rule Them All B<births>/S<survivals>/C<state_count>/N...
- October 12th, 2020, 10:25 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: NoTimeAtAll - A circuit rule with squishy signals
- Replies: 41
- Views: 18773
Re: NoTimeAtAll - A circuit rule with squishy signals
Thank you! I've just fixed that.lodyihyuaan wrote: ↑October 12th, 2020, 3:41 amYou have a typo. Icons should use XPM but not WPM as you use.![]()
- October 12th, 2020, 1:54 am
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: NoTimeAtAll - A circuit rule with squishy signals
- Replies: 41
- Views: 18773
Re: NoTimeAtAll - A circuit rule with squishy signals
Sorry to bump this old topic, but I haven't checked the forums in a while and forgot to turn on notifications for this thread! But I would like to respond to a few comments. Bringing timing to a rule with no timing: <snip> Aha, this is an unintended behavior of NTAA that I couldn't work around. In o...
- May 26th, 2019, 8:11 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: NoTimeAtAll - A circuit rule with squishy signals
- Replies: 41
- Views: 18773
NoTimeAtAll - A circuit rule with squishy signals
Anyone who's ever made almost anything in a CA circuit rule has suffered the tyranny of timing . If your gate inputs aren't perfectly timed, they'll flat-out fail, often silently. NoTimeAtAll introduces a concept to eliminate this concern: signals wait. 4eLP2ad.gif x = 17, y = 17, rule = NoTimeAtAll...
- March 17th, 2019, 7:29 pm
- Forum: Other Cellular Automata
- Topic: 2x2 p2 Metacell Rule
- Replies: 2
- Views: 3417
2x2 p2 Metacell Rule
I first showed this on Wright's Discord server, and people told me to post it here, so uh … hi! There was a small discussion about the smallest r=1 Moore outer-totalistic metacells people had made in various engineered automata, and I wondered what the absolute minimum would be, within Golly's neigh...