PotY 2020 Voting Thread

For discussion of specific patterns or specific families of patterns, both newly-discovered and well-known.
User avatar
yujh
Posts: 3066
Joined: February 27th, 2020, 11:23 pm
Location: I'm not sure where I am, so please tell me if you know
Contact:

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by yujh » February 23rd, 2021, 5:55 am

#01 ***
#02 ***
#03 **
#04 **
#05 **
#06 *
#07 ***
#08 ***
#09 ***
#10 **
#11 ***
#12 ***
#13 ***
#14 ***
#15 **
#16 **
#17 ***
#18 **
#19 ***
#20 **
#21 **
#22 ***
#23 ***
#24 ***
#25 *
#26 ***
#27 **
#28 ***
#29 ***
#30 ***
#31 ***
#32 **
#33 ***
#34 ***
#35 ***
#36 **
#37 ***
#38 ***
#39 ***
Yayayayayay
Rule modifier

B34kz5e7c8/S23-a4ityz5k
b2n3-q5y6cn7s23-k4c8
B3-kq6cn8/S2-i3-a4ciyz8
B3-kq4z5e7c8/S2-ci3-a4ciq5ek6eik7

Bored of Conway's Game of Life? Try Pedestrian Life -- not pedestrian at all!

User avatar
Pavgran
Posts: 220
Joined: June 12th, 2019, 12:14 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by Pavgran » February 24th, 2021, 8:58 am

#02 **
#03 **
#05 *
#06 *
#07 **
#08 *
#09 *
#10 ***
#11 ***
#12 ***
#13 **
#14 ***
#15 **
#16 **
#19 ***
#20 *
#23 **
#24 **
#25 *
#27 **
#28 **
#30 ***
#31 *
#32 **
#33 ***
#34 ***
#35 **
#39 **
Last edited by Pavgran on March 11th, 2021, 11:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
dvgrn
Moderator
Posts: 10612
Joined: May 17th, 2009, 11:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by dvgrn » February 24th, 2021, 10:30 am

#01 **
#02 *
#03 **
#04 *
#05 ***
#06 ***
#07 ***
#11 ***
#12 *
#13 ***
#14 **
#15 *
#16 **
#19 ***
#22 ***
#23 **
#24 ***
#25 **
#28 ***
#29 *
#30 ***
#31 *
#32 **
#33 ***
#34 ***
#35 **
#36 *
#37 ***
#38 **
#39 ***

Naszvadi
Posts: 1244
Joined: May 7th, 2016, 8:53 am
Contact:

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by Naszvadi » February 25th, 2021, 7:31 am

#01 *
#02 ***
#03 ***
#04 ***
#05 *
#06 *
#07 ***
#11 ***
#12 ***
#13 **
#14 ***
#15 *
#17 *
#18 ***
#19 ***
#20 **
#21 ***
#22 **
#23 *
#24 *
#25 ***
#27 **
#28 ***
#29 ***
#30 **
#31 ***
#32 ***
#33 ***
#34 ***
#37 **
#38 ***
#39 ***

Dylan Chen
Posts: 114
Joined: March 27th, 2020, 8:07 am
Contact:

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by Dylan Chen » February 26th, 2021, 8:36 am

#01 **
#02 ***
#03 **
#04 **
#05 **
#06 **
#07 **
#08 **
#09 ***
#10 **
#11 **
#12 ***
#13 ***
#14 **
#15 **
#16 **
#17 **
#18 **
#19 **
#20 **
#21 **
#22 **
#23 **
#24 ***
#25 **
#26 **
#27 **
#28 **
#29 ***
#30 ***
#31 ***
#32 **
#33 ***
#34 **
#35 **
#36 **
#37 ***
#38 **
#39 ***
Tools should not be the limit.
Whether your obstacle is a script, an stdin, or Linux environment computing resouces.
check New rules thread for help.

User avatar
simsim314
Posts: 1823
Joined: February 10th, 2014, 1:27 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by simsim314 » March 2nd, 2021, 8:45 pm

#01 *
#04 *
#07 *
#09 *
#10 *
#11 **
#12 **
#13 **
#14 **
#15 *
#16 *
#17 *
#18 **
#19 ***
#20 *
#21 *
#24 *
#25 **
#26 **
#27 *
#28 **
#29 *
#30 **
#32 **
#33 **
#34 ***
#35 **
#36 *
#37 **
#38 **
#39 **

@wwei47 - do you realize that voting this way is the same as not voting at all? The voting is done to estimate subjective preferences of cgol community, giving same vote to everyone express zero preference.

User avatar
simsim314
Posts: 1823
Joined: February 10th, 2014, 1:27 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by simsim314 » March 2nd, 2021, 8:48 pm

wwei47 wrote:
February 22nd, 2021, 7:53 pm
MathAndCode wrote:
February 22nd, 2021, 7:34 pm
wwei47 wrote:
February 22nd, 2021, 5:33 pm
I'll give each pattern three stars.
Doesn't that remove the point of voting?
I guess so, but it takes a lot of effort to produce those patterns, and for that, I give them 3 stars.
Different patterns take different amount of effort and have different amount of subjective impact on the importance you give them in the research of the field. Even if effort is involved there are projects that took days, weeks, months some took years maybe, they still deserve different vote.

EDIT To explain what I mean, here is pattern of mine, I call it #40, how much stars does it deserves?

Code: Select all

x = 88, y = 51, rule = B3/S23
59b25o$51b8o25bo$46b5o34bo$42b4o40bo$38b4o45bo$35b3o49bo$32b3o52bo$30b
2o55bo$28b2o57bo$26b2o59bo$24b2o61bo$21b3o63bo$19b2o66bo$17b2o68bo$15b
2o69bo$14bo70bo$12b2o17b4o50bo$10b2o16b3o4b3o46bo$8b2o16b2o10b3o42bo$
7bo17bo15b3o38bo$6bo37b2o35bo$4b2o40b2o32bo$3bo44b2o29bo$2bo47b2o26bo$
bo50b2o23bo$bo52b2o20bo$o55b2o16b2o$58bo11b4o$59bo6b4o$60bo2b3o$60b3o$
57b3o2bo$54b3o5bo$51b3o9bo$48b3o12bo$45b3o16bo$42b3o19bo$39b3o22bo$34b
5o26bo$28b6o31bo$20b8o37bo$12b8o44bo$5b7o52bo$4bo58bo$4bo56b2o$5b2o52b
2o$7bo49b2o$8b2o45b2o$10b5o36b4o$15b17o15b4o$32b15o!

MathAndCode
Posts: 5141
Joined: August 31st, 2020, 5:58 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by MathAndCode » March 3rd, 2021, 11:30 am

simsim314 wrote:
March 2nd, 2021, 8:48 pm
Different patterns take different amount of effort and have different amount of subjective impact on the importance you give them in the research of the field. Even if effort is involved there are projects that took days, weeks, months some took years maybe, they still deserve different vote.
Your points are valid, but if wwei47 genuinely sees no difference between slightly helpful and very helpful or requiring a little effort and requiring a lot of effort, then it might be best to let the issue be. The idea of the voting thread is to decide what the community as a whole judges as the best pattern, so large differences in opinion should be represented more than slight differences in opinion. If wwei47 sees no significant difference between each pattern, giving each pattern three stars is better than attempting to expand the infinitesimal range of opinions to a scale from zero to three. (Of course, by this argument, not voting at all would be just as viable as an option.) Also, welcome back.
By the way, since you seem to be the expert on making switch engines efficiently, I'm wondering whether you know of any ways to create a pair of two parallel glider-producing switch engines with seven or fewer gliders.
I am tentatively considering myself back.

User avatar
wwei47
Posts: 1651
Joined: February 18th, 2021, 11:18 am

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by wwei47 » March 3rd, 2021, 12:07 pm

MathAndCode wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 11:30 am
Your points are valid, but if wwei47 genuinely sees no difference between slightly helpful and very helpful or requiring a little effort and requiring a lot of effort, then it might be best to let the issue be. The idea of the voting thread is to decide what the community as a whole judges as the best pattern, so large differences in opinion should be represented more than slight differences in opinion. If wwei47 sees no significant difference between each pattern, giving each pattern three stars is better than attempting to expand the infinitesimal range of opinions to a scale from zero to three. (Of course, by this argument, not voting at all would be just as viable as an option.) Also, welcome back.
By the way, since you seem to be the expert on making switch engines efficiently, I'm wondering whether you know of any ways to create a pair of two parallel glider-producing switch engines with seven or fewer gliders.
1. It's not easy to judge how much effort was put into a pattern.
2. Try using the infinite growth 3G twice. EDIT by dvgrn: link to infinite growth 3G GPSE.
Edit 2:
3. I think this is my first post to be edited by a moderator! :o
Edit 3:
4. Hi dvgrn!
Last edited by wwei47 on March 24th, 2021, 8:23 am, edited 2 times in total.
Help me find high-period c/2 technology!
My guide: https://bit.ly/3uJtzu9
My c/2 tech collection: https://bit.ly/3qUJg0u
Overview of periods: https://bit.ly/3LwE0I5
Most wanted periods: 76,116

MathAndCode
Posts: 5141
Joined: August 31st, 2020, 5:58 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by MathAndCode » March 3rd, 2021, 12:33 pm

wwei47 wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 12:07 pm
2. Try using the infinite growth 3G twice. EDIT by dvgrn: link to infinite growth 3G GPSE.
It can't have escaping gliders.
I am tentatively considering myself back.

User avatar
dvgrn
Moderator
Posts: 10612
Joined: May 17th, 2009, 11:00 pm
Location: Madison, WI
Contact:

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by dvgrn » March 3rd, 2021, 1:45 pm

MathAndCode wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 12:33 pm
It can't have escaping gliders.
Aha. Any other requirements that didn't make it into the original request? How far apart or close together do these parallel glider streams have to be, to be useful?

It's easy-ish to write a search script to look for 7G no-extraneous-gliders double GPSE syntheses, but it might as well be written to look for the most useful solution first. My idea would be to set up 3G switch engine syntheses in pairs at different distances and time offsets, and then see if there's a single glider impact in the debris that can convert both switch engines to GPSEs before the natural gliders start escaping.

Luckily the first extraneous escaping glider only appears at T=583. It's a huge search space. ... Which should probably be discussed further in its own thread instead of here.

User avatar
simsim314
Posts: 1823
Joined: February 10th, 2014, 1:27 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by simsim314 » March 3rd, 2021, 1:59 pm

MathAndCode wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 11:30 am
large differences in opinion should be represented more than slight differences in opinion.
As far as I understand the voting results is just sorted eventually.
MathAndCode wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 11:30 am
If wwei47 sees no significant difference between each pattern, giving each pattern three stars is better than attempting to expand the infinitesimal range of opinions to a scale from zero to three.
If you agree that pattern #40 doesn't deserve 3 stars, then you still have some scoring function of how good some pattern is. Even this year people discovered more patterns than those 39, it's just those are of some significance chosen by the one who opened the post. Saying they all worth the same is basically the same as saying non of them worth anything. This year it's hard to find the knockout blow, pattern which way ahead of anything else done ever (like syringe or quadratic growth), but you can still find some patterns which shines more than others. I really don't want to express my subjective judgement here, but even one pattern that gets something else than 3 stars would be an input of significance.
wwei47 wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 12:07 pm
1. It's not easy to judge how much effort was put into a pattern.
I agree but some are clearly were done with much more effort than others. Even rough estimation of the effort or slight correlation with effort by how much effort you believe was put into them, is still a meaningful input. Not being able to exactly estimate the effort doesn't mean they all the same. Giving three stars to them all doesn't influence the end result in any way, if you want people to invest more effort, then having them sorted out by estimated effort put into them - would be a meaningful voting even if not completely accurate.

You can also consult an expert like dvgrn to estimate the effort.
MathAndCode wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 11:30 am
I'm wondering whether you know of any ways to create a pair of two parallel glider-producing switch engines with seven or fewer gliders.
There is a difference if you want them clean or messy. For messy and 4 gliders there is R+glider that produces glider producing SE, as of 7 gliders I would take one escaping glider for the second one. This will limit the output positions of course.

MathAndCode
Posts: 5141
Joined: August 31st, 2020, 5:58 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by MathAndCode » March 3rd, 2021, 2:19 pm

dvgrn wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 1:45 pm
MathAndCode wrote:
March 3rd, 2021, 12:33 pm
It can't have escaping gliders.
Aha. Any other requirements that didn't make it into the original request? How far apart or close together do these parallel glider streams have to be, to be useful?
Here's the GPSE pair that the seventeen-glider RCT-based universal constructor uses:

Code: Select all

x = 568, y = 591, rule = B3/S23
566bo$566b2o$565bobo21$549b2o$550b2o$549bo39$502bo$502b2o$501bobo21$485b
2o$486b2o$485bo39$438bo$438b2o$437bobo21$421b2o$422b2o$421bo39$374bo$
374b2o$373bobo21$357b2o$358b2o$357bo39$310bo$310b2o$309bobo21$293b2o$
294b2o$293bo38$169bo$162bo5bobo75bo$160b2ob2o81b2o$160b2o3bo2b3o74bob
o$160b2ob2o$161b4o$149b2o$149b2o7$141b2o$141b2o$155b3o$153b2ob4o4b4o$
153bo2b2o4b2obobo$145b2o6b3o9b2o$144bo2bo10bobo3bo$144bo2bo$145bobo$147b
4o$146b2o2bo78b2o$134b2o11b3o80b2o$133bobo12bo12b2o66bo$134bo26b2o$142b
2o5bobo$142b2o5bo$152bo$147bo4b2o$146bo6bo$146bo2b4o5$117b2o$100b2o3b
o11b2o$101bo4bo$105bo$102bobo24bo$103bo24bobo$107bo21b2o12bo$91b2o11b
3obo33bobo$91b2o10b3o2bo34b2o$102b2o2bo$103b2o$104bo$134bo$91b3o39bob
o$90b2ob3o38b2o$86bo$86bo3bo$86bo7b2o$91b2obo$93b2o$94bo6b2o$101b2o$98b
2ob2o$99b2o$93b2o9bo$92bo2bo7b3o27b2o$93b2o8b2obo25bo2bo$105b2o26b2o47b
o$182b2o$136b3o42bobo2$92b2o40bo$94bo39bo$89bo4b2o38bo$88bo3bo5bo$89b
2o7b2o31b2o$98b2o31b2o2$65b2o44bo$64bo2bo42bobo$65b2o44b2o$93b3o$91b2o
b2o$91b2ob2o$91b2o9bo$101bobo$102b2o2$139b2o$72bo66b2o$71bobo91b2o$70b
o2bo92b2o$71b2o92bo4$143b2o$101b2o40b2o$100bo2bo$101b2o2$104b3o2$102b
o126bobo$102bo126bo2bo$102bo126bobo$133b2o79b2o$99b2o32bobo77bobo$99b
2o33b2o77b3o13bo$88b3o121bo2bo11b2obo$33b2o179bo12b2obo$32bo2bo169b2o
7bo12bo3bo$33b2o170b2o20b4o$81bo130bo15b3o$81bo133bo$81bo130bo2bo$70b
o143b3o$69bobo142b3o$70b2o141bo2bo$213bobo$107b2o91b2o11b3o$40bo66b2o
90bob2o$39bobo157bo4bo$38bo2bo157bo8b2o15b2o$39b2o158bo3b2o2bobo15b2o
$206b2obo$201bo5b6o$199b2o7bo4bo$111b2o97bo2bo$69b2o40b2o24b2o47b2o23b
2o$68bo2bo65b2o47bobo14b2o$69b2o116bo15b2o12b2o$217b2o$72b3o70b2o$145b
2o$70bo94bo$70bo94bo$70bo94bo$101b2o23b2o40bo11b2o24b2o$67b2o32bobo22b
obo32b3o3bobo10bobo22bobo$67b2o33b2o23b2o38bobo11bo24bo$56b3o99b2o8bo
$b2o155b2o$o2bo184b2o$b2o185bobo$49bo139bo$49bo$49bo$38bo$37bobo$38b2o
2$75b2o$8bo66b2o$7bobo$6bo2bo183b2o$7b2o184b2o4$79b2o$37b2o40b2o24b2o
47b2o$36bo2bo65b2o47bobo$37b2o116bo2$40b3o70b2o71b2o$113b2o73bo$38bo94b
o33b2o16bobo4bo$38bo94bo33bobo16b2o3bobo$38bo94bo34b3o12b2ob2o2bo$69b
2o23b2o40bo11b2o18b2o14b3o2bo$35b2o32bobo22bobo32b3o3bobo10bobo21b3o10b
o4bo$35b2o33b2o23b2o38bobo11bo22b3o17b2o$24b3o99b2o8bo34bo21bo$126b2o
30b2o11b2o$158b3o11bo2$17bo$17bo133b3o7bo7bo7bo2bo$17bo133b3o7b2o5bob
o3b4o2bo$6bo146bo9bo4bobo4bo4b2o$5bobo142b3o7bo2bo5bo6bo4bo4b2o$6b2o142b
3o23bo3b2o4b2o$125bo33bo18bobo$43b2o80bo33bobo$43b2o80bo34bo2$177b3o5$
47b2o70b3o$5b2o40b2o24b2o$4bo2bo65b2o$5b2o2$8b3o70b2o$81b2o$6bo94bo$6b
o94bo41b2o$6bo94bo40bo2bo$37b2o23b2o40bo11b2o24bobo$3b2o32bobo22bobo32b
3o3bobo10bobo24bo$3b2o33b2o23b2o38bobo11bo$94b2o8bo$94b2o59bo$154bobo
$154bobo$155bo6$93bo$93bo$93bo7$87b3o$41b2o$41b2o3$49b2o$49b2o$69bo$69b
o41b2o$69bo40bo2bo$30b2o40bo11b2o24bobo$30bobo32b3o3bobo10bobo24bo$31b
2o38bobo11bo$62b2o8bo$62b2o59bo$122bobo$122bobo$123bo6$61bo$61bo$61bo
7$55b3o7$37bo$37bo41b2o$37bo40bo2bo$40bo11b2o24bobo$33b3o3bobo10bobo24b
o$39bobo11bo$30b2o8bo$30b2o59bo$90bobo$90bobo$91bo!
What matters is the glider stream. Changes that don't affect the glider stream, such as having one GPSE create each glider one full diagonal farther back but four generations sooner, will not cause problems. Also, some changes to the glider stream will be allowed. In order to keep using the same model, the lane difference must be kept the same, the relative timings of the two gliders modulo eight must be kept the same, and gliders from the two parallel GPSEs can't come too close together to each other, but changes that don't violate any of those should be fine. Also, if the lane separation and or modular relative timing are changed, then the current model won't work, but it will probably be possible to create a new model as long as the lane separation and relative parity are universal (which I would expect imposes a maximum lane separation) and the gliders aren't too close together timewise, so the only stringent conditions are no escaping gliders, universality, and sufficient temporal separation between when gliders from the two parallel GPSEs arrive.



Edit: Actually, if the first glider from the GPSE on the southeast arrives before the the first glider from the GPSE on the northwest or after the second glider from the GPSE on the northwest, that might cause a minor hassle, but I'm sure that there would be a way to make it work without having to overhaul the design find an entirely new set of universal operations, so we needn't worry about it.
I am tentatively considering myself back.

Sokwe
Moderator
Posts: 2645
Joined: July 9th, 2009, 2:44 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by Sokwe » March 6th, 2021, 9:05 pm

#01 **
#02 **
#03 **
#04 *
#05 **
#06 *
#07 **
#08 *
#09 *
#10 **
#11 *
#12 ***
#13 **
#14 ***
#15 **
#16 *
#17 *
#18 **
#19 ***
#20 *
#21 **
#22 ***
#23 *
#24 **
#25 *
#26 *
#27 *
#28 **
#29 *
#30 ***
#31 **
#32 *
#33 **
#34 **
#35 *
#36 *
#37 **
#38 ***
#39 ***

We still need to decide on an end date for the voting period. Last year the voting period lasted a little over 3 weeks. To have a similar voting period this year, we would end on March 17, a Wednesday. Is there a preferred day of the week to end on? Last year we ended on a Sunday.
-Matthias Merzenich

MathAndCode
Posts: 5141
Joined: August 31st, 2020, 5:58 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by MathAndCode » March 6th, 2021, 9:13 pm

Sokwe wrote:
March 6th, 2021, 9:05 pm
Is there a preferred day of the week to end on? Last year we ended on a Sunday.
I was planning to end the voting now but then saw that you voted. Shall the voting end anyway?
I am tentatively considering myself back.

User avatar
praosylen
Posts: 2443
Joined: September 13th, 2014, 5:36 pm
Location: Pembina University, Home of the Gliders
Contact:

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by praosylen » March 6th, 2021, 10:11 pm

MathAndCode wrote:
March 6th, 2021, 9:13 pm
I was planning to end the voting now but then saw that you voted. Shall the voting end anyway?
I think it's a bad idea to end voting without announcing when voting will end well in advance. My suggestion would be one of three options:
  1. End voting a week from today,
  2. End voting on Pi Day (the 14th),
    Or my personal favorite:
  3. End voting on CGoL Day (the 23rd).
former username: A for Awesome
praosylen#5847 (Discord)

The only decision I made was made
of flowers, to jump universes to one of springtime in
a land of former winter, where no invisible walls stood,
or could stand for more than a few hours at most...

MathAndCode
Posts: 5141
Joined: August 31st, 2020, 5:58 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by MathAndCode » March 6th, 2021, 10:14 pm

A for awesome wrote:
March 6th, 2021, 10:11 pm
I think it's a bad idea to end voting without announcing when voting will end well in advance.
I'm going with Sokwe's suggestion of ending on March 17th.
I am tentatively considering myself back.

User avatar
otismo
Posts: 1201
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 1:41 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by otismo » March 7th, 2021, 10:17 pm

only 25 people voted - pitiful turnout...
"One picture is worth 1000 words; but one thousand words, carefully crafted, can paint an infinite number of pictures."
- autonomic writing
forFUN : http://viropet.com
Art Gallery : http://cgolart.com
Video WebSite : http://conway.life

User avatar
PC101
Posts: 173
Joined: May 9th, 2019, 11:32 pm
Location: :uoᴉʇɐɔo˥

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by PC101 » March 8th, 2021, 1:43 am

otismo wrote:
March 7th, 2021, 10:17 pm
only 25 people voted - pitiful turnout...
About 25 people votes last year as well.
Puffer Suppressor
Would we be able to know when we know everything there is to know?
How would we know what we don’t know that we don’t know?

The (34,7)c/156 caterpillar is finished!!! You can download it here.

User avatar
Macbi
Posts: 903
Joined: March 29th, 2009, 4:58 am

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by Macbi » March 8th, 2021, 4:27 am

PC101 wrote:
March 8th, 2021, 1:43 am
otismo wrote:
March 7th, 2021, 10:17 pm
only 25 people voted - pitiful turnout...
About 25 people votes last year as well.
I did some quick counts:

Code: Select all

2010 16
2011 19
2015 22
2016 23
2017 20
2018 37
2019 25
So more than 25 people this year would actually be quite good, except in comparison to 2018 which was a bumper year (likely because Sir Robin attracted lots of people).

User avatar
otismo
Posts: 1201
Joined: August 18th, 2010, 1:41 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by otismo » March 8th, 2021, 11:57 am

hmmm...more candidates than voters - do not know what to make of it...
"One picture is worth 1000 words; but one thousand words, carefully crafted, can paint an infinite number of pictures."
- autonomic writing
forFUN : http://viropet.com
Art Gallery : http://cgolart.com
Video WebSite : http://conway.life

Anonymous Glider
Posts: 6
Joined: August 28th, 2020, 12:06 pm
Location: Somewhere (probably)

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by Anonymous Glider » March 9th, 2021, 12:25 pm

#01 **
#02 *
#03 *
#09 *
#11 **
#14 **
#16 *
#19 **
#26 *
#27 **
#28 ***
#30 **
#31 **
#32 **
#33 **
#34 ***
#35 **
#39 **

User avatar
cgoler2
Posts: 224
Joined: March 10th, 2021, 2:32 pm
Location: Living in a half-bakery

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by cgoler2 » March 10th, 2021, 4:01 pm

#2 **
#4 *
#9 **
#12 **
#16 **
#19 ***
#24 **
#30 *
#33 ***
#34 ***
#37 *
#38 **
#39 **

User avatar
JP21
Posts: 1870
Joined: October 26th, 2019, 5:39 am
Location: PH

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by JP21 » March 14th, 2021, 10:02 am

#01 *
#03 *
#04 *
#05 **
#07 *
#09 ***
#10 *
#12 **
#14 **
#15 *
#16 *
#17 *
#18 *
#19 **
#20 *
#21 **
#22 **
#23 *
#24 ***
#27 *
#28 *
#29 **
#30 *
#31 **
#33 ***
#34 **
#35 **
#36 *
#37 ***
#38 **
#39 *

MathAndCode
Posts: 5141
Joined: August 31st, 2020, 5:58 pm

Re: PotY 2020 Voting Thread

Post by MathAndCode » March 15th, 2021, 10:06 pm

This is just a reminder that the voting ends in two days (plus or minus a few hours).
I am tentatively considering myself back.

Post Reply