How much range does Bombardment have?
I haven't yet decided. Is 2 or 3 better?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 7:17 amHow much range does Bombardment have?
If players just lost their species, then the game wouldn't be realistic and interesting, especially toward the end. My idea for the game means it never ends, just like real life. Species come and go, come and go.
Does each bombing come with a price? I think they should. Maybe farther range = higher price? I say range 3, though range 3 at least should be considerably expensive. I say 200k for range 1, 300k for range 2, and 450k for range 3.
I made some new games, please join them!Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 7:32 amDoes each bombing come with a price? I think they should. Maybe farther range = higher price? I say range 3, though range 3 at least should be considerably expensive. I say 200k for range 1, 300k for range 2, and 450k for range 3.
Please come up with some adaptations and say what they do loosely.
Here are some:
Sweating: Eases cooling down but increases water consumption.
Gliding: Like flying, but only works in biomes with high differences like mountains or forests and doesn't consume as much food.
Fat Tissue: Lets you store extra food in your body.
Armor: You can handle small numbers of predators better, but you are slower.
Notice how all but one of the adaptations have both pros and cons.
I saw your quiz game. What else do you have? Are my prices for bombing good? I did enjoy my durian, thank you very much for it.
Not sure,on the first sight too expensive,but not on the set....Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 7:41 amI saw your quiz game. What else do you have? Are my prices for bombing good? I did enjoy my durian, thank you very much for it.
Ok then. New prices:
All you can see in the Sandbox. You can change page to find more.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 7:45 amOk then. New prices:
Range 1 - 170k
Range 2 - 250k
Range 3 - 400k
What other games do you have?
We could use coins for money - 25k per coin. Do you have time for ideas for my game?
Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 9:18 amWe could use coins for money - 25k per coin. Do you have time for ideas for my game?
You are behaving like money and coins are not the same!They are, that's why we should use coins to represent in-game money.BokaBB wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 9:22 amSchiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 9:18 amWe could use coins for money - 25k per coin. Do you have time for ideas for my game?
Please play my games!
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Oh, I understand.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 9:30 amThey are, that's why we should use coins to represent in-game money.BokaBB wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 9:22 amSchiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 9:18 amWe could use coins for money - 25k per coin. Do you have time for ideas for my game?
Please play my games!
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Please contribute to my game. I have given a lot of ideas for yours, please you do the same thing too.
Oki - doki.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 12:04 pmPlease contribute to my game. I have given a lot of ideas for yours, please you do the same thing too.
Thank you! What do you mean by "decreases the possibility to work"? I also don't want any real-life taxonomical divisions in my game, so no mammals, but the marsupial pouch (that's what it's called) is certainly a good idea. How would it be advantageous/disadvantageous compared to regular pregnancy? And how are wings different from "regular" flying?BokaBB wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 12:24 pmOki - doki.
I really don't have many ideas right now, but I will try:
Wings:allows flying,but requires lesser body mass.
Big Neck:allows protection from most predators,but makes lowering down harder.
Floats:allows easier swimming,but decreases the possibility to work.
Bag (like that in kangaroo):allows protection of the babies,but makes them more vulnerable. Requires being a mammal.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Wings aren't different at all,they are needed to fly.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 12:33 pmThank you! What do you mean by "decreases the possibility to work"? I also don't want any real-life taxonomical divisions in my game, so no mammals, but the marsupial pouch (that's what it's called) is certainly a good idea. How would it be advantageous/disadvantageous compared to regular pregnancy? And how are wings different from "regular" flying?BokaBB wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 12:24 pmOki - doki.
I really don't have many ideas right now, but I will try:
Wings:allows flying,but requires lesser body mass.
Big Neck:allows protection from most predators,but makes lowering down harder.
Floats:allows easier swimming,but decreases the possibility to work.
Bag (like that in kangaroo):allows protection of the babies,but makes them more vulnerable. Requires being a mammal.
Have a good day!
BokaBB
Maybe stored fat could help you float? Air sacs could be another way of regulating buoyancy. Floats sound unnatural. For flying, maybe there could be a food penalty for flying when you're heavier. But there should be a maximum size for flight.
Hmmmmm,did you misunderstood me?Under floats I was thinking about additional skin ducks have on legs.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 2:33 pmMaybe stored fat could help you float? Air sacs could be another way of regulating buoyancy. Floats sound unnatural. For flying, maybe there could be a food penalty for flying when you're heavier. But there should be a maximum size for flight.
For Intelligence Agency, when a bomb is used in a city, everyone from all sides (spies, soldiers, thieves etc.) will be put in a bag and 3 randomly picked ones will be the survivors. If there are eight or less people, everyone will die. All buildings will also be destroyed.
Maybe fat tissue could decrease an animal's ability to run from predators/chase prey because fat tissue would have weight?Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 7:32 amNotice how all but one of the adaptations have both pros and cons.
Ok, now I get you. They're called webbed feet. I think most animals wouldn't need to manipulate things in the first place, so it would probably cause a negligible at best disadvantage. But maybe we could have an adaptation "simple tool using" that can't work with webbed feet. What do you think?
Sounds good. I think that that tissue could increase body size directly for a certain number of food. I was already thinking that the larger you are the more food you need to move, so you probably could run when you're large, but it would use a lot of food.MathAndCode wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 8:51 pmMaybe fat tissue could decrease an animal's ability to run from predators/chase prey because fat tissue would have weight?
GENIAL IDEA!!!!!!!!!!I highly support that. That would require big brain and hands.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 8th, 2020, 2:23 amOk, now I get you. They're called webbed feet. I think most animals wouldn't need to manipulate things in the first place, so it would probably cause a negligible at best disadvantage. But maybe we could have an adaptation "simple tool using" that can't work with webbed feet. What do you think?Sounds good. I think that that tissue could increase body size directly for a certain number of food. I was already thinking that the larger you are the more food you need to move, so you probably could run when you're large, but it would use a lot of food.MathAndCode wrote: ↑December 7th, 2020, 8:51 pmMaybe fat tissue could decrease an animal's ability to run from predators/chase prey because fat tissue would have weight?
Disadvantages of "simple tool using"? It would use more food, because it takes more energy to power a bigger brain. Higher intelligence = higher brain power consumption = more energy needed.
Maybe there should also be a risk of accidentally cutting oneself with a tool, getting a splinter if the tool is a stick, or a piece of the rock flying off and harming the animal (e.g. hitting the animal in the eye) if the tool is a rock.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 8th, 2020, 2:41 amDisadvantages of "simple tool using"? It would use more food, because it takes more energy to power a bigger brain. Higher intelligence = higher brain power consumption = more energy needed.
Can you contribute to Intelligence Agency, please?MathAndCode wrote: ↑December 8th, 2020, 1:54 pmMaybe there should also be a risk of accidentally cutting oneself with a tool, getting a splinter if the tool is a stick, or a piece of the rock flying off and harming the animal (e.g. hitting the animal in the eye) if the tool is a rock.Schiaparelliorbust wrote: ↑December 8th, 2020, 2:41 amDisadvantages of "simple tool using"? It would use more food, because it takes more energy to power a bigger brain. Higher intelligence = higher brain power consumption = more energy needed.
Also, maybe the players should be allowed to change the mutation rate. Higher mutation rates make evolution more frequent but also increase the possibility of detrimental mutations.
Well, When I was first thinking about this game, I was thinking about variation within a species, but I decided that it would be too hard. Do you have any ideas for making it work? I assume when we're talking about mutations, the member with a mutation would be slightly different than the others.MathAndCode wrote: ↑December 8th, 2020, 1:54 pmMaybe there should also be a risk of accidentally cutting oneself with a tool, getting a splinter if the tool is a stick, or a piece of the rock flying off and harming the animal (e.g. hitting the animal in the eye) if the tool is a rock.
Also, maybe the players should be allowed to change the mutation rate. Higher mutation rates make evolution more frequent but also increase the possibility of detrimental mutations.
Are you saying that to me and/or MathAndCode?
