RLE talk:Eheptomino synth

Not sure what to do with this proposed deletion exactly. It's maybe not **always** true that synthesis patterns should not be added to the RLE namespace.

That's certainly **usually** true, because a more up-to-date synthesis can usually be found by following the link to Catagolue. But there are some cases, like this one, where Catagolue doesn't have a synthesis, and/or because Catagolue has only one synthesis and it's really useful to have multiple syntheses collected, along the lines of Mark Niemiec's database. For now I'll just leave it as proposed-delete, until someone else comments and/or makes a decision! Dvgrn (talk) 19:38, 9 November 2021 (UTC)