Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Sparking oscillators"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "= Name = I think Category:Sparking oscillators would sound better. Category:Sparkers would sound even better, but unfortunately there is some ambiguity, because s...") |
(→Name) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I think [[:Category:Sparking oscillators]] would sound better. [[:Category:Sparkers]] would sound even better, but unfortunately there is some ambiguity, because [[sparker]] may also refer to a spaceship. [[User:Codeholic|Codeholic]] ([[User talk:Codeholic|talk]]) 17:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC) | I think [[:Category:Sparking oscillators]] would sound better. [[:Category:Sparkers]] would sound even better, but unfortunately there is some ambiguity, because [[sparker]] may also refer to a spaceship. [[User:Codeholic|Codeholic]] ([[User talk:Codeholic|talk]]) 17:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC) | ||
: Agreed. "Oscillators with sparks" would also be standard English, but I like "sparking oscillators" a little better. Seems like it could be a useful category. [[User:Dvgrn|Dvgrn]] ([[User talk:Dvgrn|talk]]) 16:52, 17 September 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:52, 17 September 2015
Name
I think Category:Sparking oscillators would sound better. Category:Sparkers would sound even better, but unfortunately there is some ambiguity, because sparker may also refer to a spaceship. Codeholic (talk) 17:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)