Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lobster"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (→proposed move to 'Lobster': more talk on names.) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
I don't think this is a good idea to call another pattern a lobster, if this name has been already reserved. [[User:Codeholic|Codeholic]] 11:49, 14 September 2011 (CDT) | I don't think this is a good idea to call another pattern a lobster, if this name has been already reserved. [[User:Codeholic|Codeholic]] 11:49, 14 September 2011 (CDT) | ||
:Lobster (spaceship) is workable, but awkward. Another name would be fine, but this diagonal c/7 spaceship is too important to be called 83P7H1V1! 83P7H1V1 is not a nice name.--[[User:Scotgot|Scot Ellison]] 12:12, 14 September 2011 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:12, 14 September 2011
proposed move to 'Lobster'
Scot Ellison proposed the name 'lobster' for this pattern, which I have no objections to. I intend to move this page unless someone else has any objections.
~Sokwe 16:33, 13 September 2011 (CDT)
OK --David 00:25, 14 September 2011 (CDT)
There seems to be a problem with naming the ship lobster. Lobster is already a page and an alternate name to breeder 1.--Scot Ellison 11:38, 14 September 2011 (CDT)
I don't think this is a good idea to call another pattern a lobster, if this name has been already reserved. Codeholic 11:49, 14 September 2011 (CDT)
- Lobster (spaceship) is workable, but awkward. Another name would be fine, but this diagonal c/7 spaceship is too important to be called 83P7H1V1! 83P7H1V1 is not a nice name.--Scot Ellison 12:12, 14 September 2011 (CDT)